I just noticed that basic data such as historical Gross Domestic Product (GDP) at market prices in local currency differs between the World Bank (WB) and the OECD. For instance, for Canada between 2010 and 2013:
WB : 1,662,757,000,000 1,760,011,000,000 1,819,967,000,000 1,881,200,000,000
OECD : 1.66276E+12 1.77001E+12 1.83123E+12 1.89376E+12
Or France:
WB : 1,998,481,000,000 2,059,284,000,000 2,091,059,000,000 2,113,687,000,000
OECD : 1.99711E+12 2.05812E+12 2.08639E+12 2.11789E+12
[OECD]/[WB]-1 : N/A -0.06% -0.22% +0.20%
The differences are not huge, but for data that has presumably been sourced straight from national statistical institutions with no inflation correction, I'm still surprised. Also, the WB site mentions for its sources: "World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files."
Figures for GDP growth (real) in France in 2013 then differ by 46bp (OECD: 0.74%, WB: 0.29%) (42bp are explained by the difference in current GDP figures, the other 4bp come from differences in GDP deflator data), which is rather material.
Is anyone familiar enough with these 2 institutions' data collection methodologies to explain where these differences come from?
Edit: Just for fun, I have downloaded the data for France from the "official" sources (INSEE, and Eurostat which gets its data from INSEE) and here is the result:
For GDP at current (market) prices:
2010 2011 2012 2013
INSEE 1,998.5 2,059.3 2,086.9 2,116.6
Eurostat 1,998.5 2,059.3 2,086.9 2,116.6
OECD 1,997.1 2,058.1 2,086.4 2,117.9
WB 1,998.5 2,059.3 2,091.1 2,113.7
And for real GDP growth:
2010 2011 2012 2013
INSEE 2.0 2.1 0.2 0.7
Eurostat 2.0 2.1 0.2 0.7
OECD 1.88 2.09 0.21 0.75
WB 1.97 2.08 0.33 0.29
That's quite depressing ...
xrat double %10.0g Exchange Rate to US$
. So, you may have nominal GDP in PWT.