Timeline for Is there a source for various Scrabble dictionaries?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
18 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 9, 2020 at 15:54 | answer | added | philshem | timeline score: 3 | |
Oct 29, 2019 at 18:30 | answer | added | Emily Shine | timeline score: 1 | |
Aug 28, 2019 at 14:59 | comment | added | Kef Schecter | I don't understand how you get from "not officially recognized" to "not copyrighted". Surely the creator of the list may copyright the list without any recognition necessary. | |
May 8, 2019 at 21:15 | answer | added | philshem | timeline score: 3 | |
May 8, 2019 at 21:05 | history | edited | philshem | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
dead links
|
Aug 20, 2016 at 15:41 | history | edited | albert | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
Aug 19, 2016 at 22:42 | history | edited | Cat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 109 characters in body
|
Sep 21, 2015 at 18:45 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackOpenData/status/646032488851185665 | ||
Sep 21, 2015 at 16:09 | history | edited | Franck Dernoncourt |
edited tags
|
|
Mar 30, 2015 at 14:42 | history | edited | Patrick Hoefler |
edited tags
|
|
Mar 12, 2015 at 20:22 | answer | added | Cesar Bielich | timeline score: 5 | |
May 12, 2013 at 17:39 | history | edited | Cat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
May 12, 2013 at 17:37 | comment | added | Cat | @PatrickHoefler I know for a fact that SOWPODS and TWL are not officially recognized, and thus are not copyrighted. OSPD is actually copyrighted (Hasbro v RJ Software, section 24C), so I'll adjust my question accordingly. | |
May 12, 2013 at 17:26 | answer | added | Joe Germuska | timeline score: 8 | |
May 12, 2013 at 17:17 | comment | added | Joe | I can't answer directly -- but I know that Wordnik pulled that data from somewhere so they could tell you if it was a valid Scrable work or not ... I bet Erin would tell you if you asked her. | |
May 12, 2013 at 17:16 | comment | added | Patrick Hoefler | One interesting aspect would be the licenses under which these datasets are released. The first two seem to be open data, although there is no explicit license statement. The third one has a copyright statement, however it is not clear what database it accesses and if / how it is licensed. Do you have any additional information on this? | |
May 12, 2013 at 16:42 | review | First posts | |||
May 12, 2013 at 17:16 | |||||
May 12, 2013 at 16:27 | history | asked | Cat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |