4

I would like to publish my pictures, and the license that I like most is CC BY-SA... except that I don't care about attribution.

So, what license should I use?
Requirements:

  • Exactly like CC BY-SA 3.0 but not requiring attribution
  • English language, translations available
  • The best well-known the better

If several licenses satisfy these requirements, the winner will be picked by Google fight.

Non-solutions:

  • CC-SA looks perfect but its page says:
    "This license is retired. Do not use for new works."
  • GFDL is burdensome when printing so it won't do either.
  • So the attribution should only contain a reference to the license, but not your name or the URL to your work? What about indiciation of modifications to your work? – unor Sep 18 '15 at 11:57
  • Make a custom license. – John Militer Jul 9 '17 at 15:40
  • @JohnMiliter: Unfortunately, that does not quite fit the second and third requirements ;-) – Nicolas Raoul Jul 10 '17 at 2:50
  • 1
    Though I do wish that they didn't decide to retire CC-SA. – John Militer Jul 10 '17 at 3:22
1

Consider the Public Domain Mark, CC0, (longer details), except is doesn't include the Share-Alike

When a work is in the public domain, it is free for use by anyone for any purpose without restriction under copyright law. Public domain is the purest form of open/free, since no one owns or controls the material in any way.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.