Timeline for Does there exist an authoritative definition of an open dataset?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
17 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Oct 1 at 6:39 | history | suggested | tripleee | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
English fixes
|
| Sep 23 at 11:49 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Oct 1 at 6:39 | |||||
| Feb 28, 2016 at 15:45 | history | edited | albert | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
grammar, clarification, spelling
|
| Jul 23, 2013 at 15:21 | answer | added | Ventolinmono | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 25, 2013 at 16:41 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| May 24, 2013 at 12:07 | answer | added | Francois | timeline score: 1 | |
| S May 24, 2013 at 9:54 | history | suggested | ldodds | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Typo in title
|
| May 24, 2013 at 9:28 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S May 24, 2013 at 9:54 | |||||
| May 23, 2013 at 23:03 | answer | added | Rufus Pollock | timeline score: 14 | |
| May 23, 2013 at 19:09 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackOpenData/status/337646412160434176 | ||
| May 23, 2013 at 18:50 | comment | added | user135 | Just to make sure: The goal of this question is not to arrive at definition (that's not realistic, and SE discourages discussion). The goal of this question is to identify the players in the definition game, and the definitions that are in play. I've got some good pointers already, but I hope for more. | |
| May 23, 2013 at 17:46 | comment | added | Andrew Pendleton | That opinion is reasonable, but far from universal, and not shared by many people/organizations that consider themselves players in the open data space. If the goal of this question is to arrive at a definition of open data that can achieve community consensus, I don't think that can be a requirement. I would also dispute your characterization of non-linked open data as useless -- I make use of it every day. It all depends on what your intended use is. | |
| May 23, 2013 at 17:25 | comment | added | user135 | I am aware of the discussion, but IMNSHO, data must provide linked semantics to be considered "open" (they're pretty useless without it). And while we have an eight times upvoted answer here that say they're orthogonal to one another, I am not so sure about that ... (I am OK with the part that says that not all linked data are open, but not vice versa.) | |
| May 23, 2013 at 17:17 | comment | added | Andrew Pendleton | Not an answer to your question, but be wary of conflating linked data and open data; they're orthogonal to one another, and data can be neither, one, the other, or both. See opendata.stackexchange.com/questions/522/… for more discussion. | |
| May 23, 2013 at 16:54 | answer | added | Sicco | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 23, 2013 at 16:41 | answer | added | ldodds | timeline score: 4 | |
| May 23, 2013 at 16:33 | history | asked | user135 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |