Timeline for Dataset Wanted: Classification
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2017 at 14:01 | comment | added | Boern | Another caveat of the forrest dataset is, that is it is intended to be used for regression (instead of classification) | |
| Apr 10, 2017 at 7:27 | comment | added | Boern |
My backup plan is to use the forrest dataset, although not being ideal because alsmost every object/forrest (except 2/3, 8/4 and 9/5) is observed multiple times. A dataset with a higher ratio of objects, observed only once, is desirable. We have the same understanding of what "features" are. I just don't get what to use as feature in your proposed dataset. The "price" is too trivial. Also, more features would be desirable.
|
|
| Apr 8, 2017 at 21:49 | comment | added | timcardenuto | @Boern Is there a reason you can't use the forest fire data you just linked to? They have a CSV file for the data. Also it'd be helpful if you explained what you mean by "features" or what kinds of things you're looking for. To me that just means interesting observations in some number value range. | |
| Apr 7, 2017 at 15:05 | comment | added | Boern | It's a bit unclear what features to use. I don't want to spend to much time in feature engineering since I want to use the dataset for a scientific paper (where I would have to explain the whole process and that's too much wasted space) | |
| Mar 31, 2017 at 20:43 | review | First posts | |||
| Apr 1, 2017 at 2:15 | |||||
| Mar 31, 2017 at 20:29 | history | answered | timcardenuto | CC BY-SA 3.0 |